HLA Haplotypes In 250 Families: The Baylor Laboratory Results And A Perspective On A Core NGS Testing Model For The 17th International HLA And Immunogenetics Workshop.

Since their inception, the International HLA & Immunogenetics Workshops (IHIW) served as a collaborative platform for exchange of specimens, reference materials, experiences and best practices. In this report we present a subset of the results of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes in families tested by next generation sequencing (NGS) under the 17th IHIW. We characterized 961 haplotypes in 921 subjects belonging to 250 families from 8 countries (Argentina, Austria, Egypt, Jamaica, Germany, Greece, Kuwait, and Switzerland). These samples were tested in a single core laboratory in a high throughput fashion using 6 different reagents/software platforms. Families tested included patients evaluated clinically as transplant recipients (kidney and hematopoietic cell transplant) and their respective family members. We identified 486 HLA alleles at the following loci HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, -DPB1 (77, 115, 68, 69, 10, 6, 4, 44, 31, 20 and 42 alleles, respectively). We also identified nine novel alleles with polymorphisms in coding regions. This approach of testing samples from multiple laboratories across the world in different stages of technology implementation in a single core laboratory may be useful for future international workshops. Although data presented may not be reflective of allele and haplotype frequencies in the countries to which the families belong, they represent an extensive collection of 3rd and 4th field resolution level 11-locus haplotype associations of 486 alleles identified in families from 8 countries.

Pharmacodynamic effects of prasugrel dosing regimens in patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy: results of a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of different prasugrel dosing regimens in patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy. BACKGROUND: There are a growing number of patients on chronic prasugrel therapy regimens, leading to questions about the dosing regimen of prasugrel to administer if percutaneous coronary intervention is required. METHODS: This is a prospective pharmacodynamic study in patients (n = 64) receiving maintenance prasugrel therapy who were randomly allocated to a 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg dose of prasugrel. Pharmacodynamic assessments using multiple assays were conducted at 3 timepoints (baseline and 1 h and 4 h after dosing). RESULTS: Intragroup comparisons showed that a 60 mg dose reduced the platelet reactivity index (PRI) after 1 h (p = 0.004) and 4 h (p < 0.001, primary endpoint; p = 0.002 between 1 h and 4 h). A 30 mg dose also reduced PRI levels at 1 h (p = 0.006) and 4 h (p < 0.001; p = 0.044 between 1 h and 4 h). A 10 mg dose was associated with modest pharmacodynamic effects. Intragroup comparisons showed similar findings with VerifyNow-P2Y12 and light transmission aggregometry. Intergroup comparisons showed that a 60 mg dose achieved lower PRI levels than 30 mg at 4 h (p = 0.05), and a numerical trend toward better pharmacodynamic effects at 1 h (p = 0.171). Intergroup comparisons were similar with VerifyNow-P2Y12, but not light transmission aggregometry. CONCLUSIONS: For patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy, a 60 mg dosing strategy is associated with faster and higher platelet inhibition compared with lower doses, as assessed by P2Y(12) specific assays. (Impact of Prasugrel Re-load on Platelet Aggregation in Patients on Chronic Prasugrel Therapy; NCT01201772).

Cigarette smoking is associated with a dose-response effect in clopidogrel-treated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of a pharmacodynamic study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the presence of a dose-response effect of cigarette smoking and its impact on high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with clopidogrel. BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is an inducer of cytochrome P450 1A2, a hepatic enzyme involved in clopidogrel metabolism. If cigarette smoking is associated with a dose-response effect on pharmacodynamic measures in clopidogrel-treated patients is unknown. METHODS: A total of 134 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel therapy were studied. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to cotinine levels: <3 ng/ml (nonsmokers), 3 to 199 ng/ml (light smokers), and ≥ 200 ng/ml (heavy smokers). Platelet function was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein. Rates of HPR were defined using established cutoff values. RESULTS: A dose-response effect was observed for all pharmacodynamic parameters tested. Serum cotinine levels were inversely associated with platelet reactivity as assessed by light transmittance aggregometry using 5 and 20 µmol/l adenosine diphosphate (p < 0.0001 for all). Accordingly, platelet disaggregation increased with levels of serum cotinine (p < 0.0001). Similar results were found with P2Y(12) reaction units (p < 0.0001) and inhibition of platelet aggregation (p = 0.005) as defined by VerifyNow P2Y12 testing, and platelet reactivity index (p = 0.002) as assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein. Higher serum cotinine levels were significantly associated with lower rates of HPR, as defined according to various pharmacodynamic cutoff measures. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking is associated with a dose-response effect on clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects and lower rates of HPR in diabetes mellitus patients.

Impact of pentoxifylline on platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor pentoxifylline on platelet function profiles in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that, in patients receiving DAPT, the adjunctive use of a PDE inhibitor enhances platelet inhibition, particularly in those presenting with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of the PDE inhibitor pentoxifylline on platelet function profiles in DM patients receiving DAPT are unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel design study conducted in DM patients with stable coronary artery disease receiving DAPT. Patients were randomly assigned to either pentoxifylline 400 mg or placebo 3 times daily for 14 days. The PD effects were assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetric, Inc., San Diego, California), and multiple electrode aggregometry at baseline and 14 days. The PD effects were also assessed according the presence or absence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity status. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were available for analysis. At 14 days, there were no differences in the P2Y(12) reactivity index as assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation between treatment groups (primary endpoint; p = 0.93). Intra-group comparisons also failed to show any differences between baseline and 14-day P2Y(12) reactivity index assessment in the placebo and pentoxifylline arms (p = 0.61). There were no significant inter- and intra-group differences in all other PD measures. The PD effects did not vary according the presence or absence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive treatment with pentoxifylline is not associated with increased platelet inhibitory effects in DM patients with coronary artery disease receiving DAPT.

Impact of adjunctive cilostazol therapy on platelet function profiles in patients with and without diabetes mellitus on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Cilostazol is a platelet inhibitor which when added to aspirin and clopidogrel has shown to reduce the risk of recurrent ischaemic events without an increase in bleeding. These clinical benefits have shown to be more pronounced in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, it remains unknown whether cilostazol exerts different pharmacodynamic effects in patients with and without DM. This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pharmacodynamic study comparing platelet function in patients with and without DM on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Patients (n=111) were randomly assigned to either cilostazol 100 mg or placebo twice daily for 14 days and afterwards crossed-over treatment for another 14 days. Platelet function was performed at baseline, 14 days post-randomisation, and 14 days post-cross-over. Functional testing to assess P2Y12 signalling included flow cytometric analysis of phosphorylation status of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein measured by P2Y12 reactivity index (PRI), light transmittance aggregometry and VerifyNow. Thrombin generation processes were also studied using thrombelastography. Significantly lower PRI values were observed following treatment with cilostazol compared with placebo both in DM and non-DM groups (p < 0.0001). The absolute between-treatment differences of PRI between groups was a 35.1% lower in patients with DM (p=0.039). Similar results were obtained using all other functional measures assessing P2Y12 signalling. Thrombin generation was not affected by cilostazol. Cilostazol reduces platelet reactivity both in patients with and without DM, although these pharmacodynamic effects are enhanced in patients with DM. Despite the marked platelet inhibition, cilostazol does not alter thrombin-mediated haemostatic processes, which may explain its ischaemic benefit without the increased risk of bleeding.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of pantoprazole therapy on clopidogrel effects: results of a prospective, randomized, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Safety concerns have recently emerged based on a drug interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors leading to reduced pharmacodynamic effects. However, whether such drug interaction is a class effect or a drug effect and if this can be modulated by timing of drug administration remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of high-dose pantoprazole therapy, a proton pump inhibitor with low potential to interfere with clopidogrel metabolism, administered concomitantly or staggered, on clopidogrel-mediated pharmacodynamic effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study conducted in 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole (80 mg daily) administered concomitantly (CONC) or staggered by 8 to 12 hours (STAG) for 1 week on a background of clopidogrel therapy (600-mg loading dose followed by a 75-mg maintenance dose during all phases) in a crossover fashion with a 2- to 4-week washout period between treatments. All subjects had a 1-week treatment phase with a clopidogrel-only regimen with a 2- to 4-week washout period from randomization sequence. Platelet function was assessed by flow cytometric analysis of the status of phosphorylation of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, light transmittance aggregometry after adenosine diphosphate stimuli, and VerifyNow P2Y(12) system at 3 time points: baseline, 24 hours after loading dose, and 1 week after maintenance dose. The primary end point was the comparison of P2Y(12) reactivity index assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein at 1 week. After 1 week, there were no significant difference in P2Y(12) reactivity index between the CONC and STAG regimens (least-squares mean±SEM, 56.0±3.9% versus 56.1±3.9%; P=0.974), as well as when compared with the clopidogrel-only regimen (61.0±3.9%; P=0.100 versus CONC and P=0.107 versus STAG). Further, no differences were observed at baseline and 24 hours between regimens. Concordant results were obtained by light transmittance aggregometry and VerifyNow P2Y(12) assays. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole therapy used at high doses is not associated with modulation of the pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel, irrespective of timing of drug administration. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01170533.

Pharmacodynamic effects of concomitant versus staggered clopidogrel and omeprazole intake: results of a prospective randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: A drug interaction between clopidogrel and omeprazole resulting in impaired platelet inhibition has been reported. It has been suggested that staggering administration of clopidogrel and omeprazole may overcome this pharmacodynamic (PD) interaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, open-label, 3-period, randomized crossover study was performed in 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly selected to receive omeprazole (40 mg daily) concomitantly (CONC) or staggered by 8 to 12 hours (STAG) for 1 week on a background of clopidogrel therapy in a crossover fashion, with a 2- to 4-week washout period between treatments. After another 2- to 4-week washout period, all subjects were treated for 1 week with clopidogrel alone. Clopidogrel was administered as a 600-mg loading dose followed by a 75-mg maintenance dose during all phases. PD effects were assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, VerifyNow P2Y(12) system, and light transmittance aggregometry at baseline, 24 hours, and 1 week. The primary end point was the comparison of P2Y(12) reactivity index assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay at 1 week between CONC and STAG regimens. No significant difference in the primary end point was observed (least squares mean ± SEM, 56.1 ± 3.5% for CONC versus 61.6 ± 3.4% for STAG; P = 0.08). P2Y(12) reactivity index values were significantly lower in the clopidogrel regimen (48.8 ±3.4%) than in the CONC (P = 0.02) and STAG (P = 0.001) regimens. No PD differences were observed between regimens at baseline and 24 hours. Concordant results were obtained by P2Y(12)-specific assessments using VerifyNow but not with light transmittance aggregometry. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole impairs clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects in the maintenance phase of treatment irrespective of timing of their administration.

Impact of P2Y(12) inhibitory effects induced by clopidogrel on platelet procoagulant activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients have a variable response profile to the P2Y(12) receptor antagonist clopidogrel. P2Y(12) receptor signalling promotes platelet procoagulant activity. The aim of this study was to determine if T2DM patients with suboptimal clopidogrel response have greater platelet procoagulant activity compared with optimal responders and evaluate if this can be modulated by enhancing P2Y(12) receptor inhibition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 T2DM patients in a steady state phase of clopidogrel therapy were studied. Suboptimal responders were randomly assigned to standard (75 mg) or high (150 mg) clopidogrel maintenance therapy for one-month. Afterwards, all patients resumed standard therapy. Platelet procoagulant activity assessed by thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot formation using thrombelastography (TEG) was determined at baseline, one-month post-randomization, and one-month after resuming standard therapy. RESULTS: In the overall study population, the reaction time (R), a measure of time to initial thrombin induced platelet-fibrin clot formation, and the time to maximum rate of thrombin generation (TMRTG) values were 6.3+/-1.7 and 7.6+/-1.9 minutes, respectively. Suboptimal clopidogrel responders (n=30) had acceleration of R (p=0.002) and TMRTG (p=0.002) compared to optimal responders (n=20). Suboptimal clopidogrel responders treated with a 150 mg dose showed prolongation of R (p=0.0001) and TMRTG (p<0.0001), which returned to baseline values after resuming standard dosage. No differences were observed among patients randomized to 75 mg. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM patients with suboptimal clopidogrel response have enhanced platelet procoagulant activity compared to patients with optimal response, which can be down-regulated by more potent platelet P2Y(12) inhibition using high clopidogrel maintenance dosing.

A randomized study assessing the impact of cilostazol on platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the OPTIMUS-2 study.

AIMS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have reduced platelet inhibition compared with non-diabetics following P2Y(12) receptor blockade. Whether inhibition of P2Y(12) signalling can be enhanced by adjunctive treatment with cilostazol in T2DM patients is unknown. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the functional impact of cilostazol in T2DM patients on standard aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over platelet function study. T2DM patients on dual antiplatelet therapy were assigned to receive cilostazol 100 mg or placebo twice daily for 14 days and afterwards crossed-over treatment assignments for another 14 days. Platelet function was performed at three time points: at baseline, 14 days after randomization, and 14 days after treatment cross-over. The P2Y(12) reactivity index, determined through flow cytometric assessment of the phosphorylation status of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, was the primary endpoint measure. In addition to this flow cytometric evaluation, light transmittance aggregometry and VerifyNow testing were performed. A total of 25 T2DM patients were randomized; five patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. The P2Y(12) reactivity index was significantly lower following cilostazol treatment compared with placebo (36.3 +/- 20 vs. 59.9 +/- 16%; P = 0.0002). All other P2Y(12)-specific functional assessments showed enhanced inhibition of this signalling pathway following treatment with cilostazol. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive treatment with cilostazol in T2DM patients on standard dual antiplatelet therapy enhances inhibition of platelet P2Y(12) signalling.

Functional effects of high clopidogrel maintenance dosing in patients with inadequate platelet inhibition on standard dose treatment.

Updated guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention recommend increasing the dose of clopidogrel to 150 mg in high-risk patients if <50% platelet inhibition is demonstrated. However, to date, the functional impact of this recommendation has been poorly explored. The aim of this study was to assess the functional implications associated with the use of clopidogrel 150 mg/day in patients with inadequate platelet inhibition while receiving standard 75 mg/day maintenance treatment. Patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher prevalence of inadequate clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects and stent thrombosis compared with those without diabetes and were selected for this analysis. Platelet inhibition was assessed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving dual-antiplatelet therapy. Patients (n = 17) with <50% platelet inhibition were treated with clopidogrel 150 mg/day for 1 month. Adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation and the P2Y12 reactivity ratio were also assessed. Platelet function profiles were compared with that of a control group (n = 17) with >or=50% inhibition. Platelet inhibition increased from 27.1 +/- 12% to 40.6 +/- 18% in patients treated with clopidogrel 150 mg/day (p = 0.009; primary end point). All other functional measures also showed enhanced clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects. The degree of platelet inhibition achieved after treatment with clopidogrel 150 mg/day varied broadly, and only 35% of patients yielded a degree of platelet inhibition >or=50%. Increasing the dose in patients with inadequate response to clopidogrel did not reach the same degree of antiplatelet effects as those achieved in patients with adequate response while receiving 75 mg/day. In conclusion, the use of a 150 mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel in patients with type 2 diabetes with <50% platelet inhibition is associated with enhanced antiplatelet effects. However, the antiplatelet effects achieved are nonuniform, and a considerable number of patients persist with inadequate platelet inhibition.

Randomized comparison of a high clopidogrel maintenance dose in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of the Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus (OPTIMUS) study.

BACKGROUND: After treatment with clopidogrel, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have reduced platelet inhibition compared with patients who are not diabetic. Whether platelet inhibition can be enhanced by increasing clopidogrel maintenance dosage in T2DM patients is unknown. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the functional impact of a high maintenance dose in T2DM patients with suboptimal clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: T2DM patients on chronic dual antiplatelet therapy were screened to identify suboptimal clopidogrel responders. The latter were randomized to 30-day treatment with a standard (75 mg; n=20) or high (150 mg; n=20) daily maintenance dose. Platelet function was assessed at 3 time points: baseline, 30 days after randomization, and 30 days after resuming standard dosing. Platelet function parameters included adenosine diphosphate-induced (20 and 5 micromol/L) maximal and late platelet aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation, platelet disaggregation, and P2Y12 reactivity index. A total of 64 T2DM patients were screened to identify 40 suboptimal responders. After randomization, maximal adenosine diphosphate-induced (20 micromol/L) platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in the 150-mg group compared with the 75-mg group (P=0.002; primary end point). However, suboptimal clopidogrel response was still present in 60% of patients on the 150-mg regimen. All other platelet function parameters showed enhanced clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects with 150 mg, which returned to baseline values after resumption of standard dosing. CONCLUSIONS: A 150-mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel is associated with enhanced antiplatelet effects compared with 75 mg in high-risk T2DM patients. However, enhanced ex vivo platelet reactivity continues to persist, the clinical implications of which are unknown and need to be evaluated in large-scale clinical trials.

One hundred consecutive living kidney donors: modern issues and outcomes.

In order to define current issues and outcomes of living kidney donation, 100 consecutive living donors operated on between July 1996 and March 2001 were evaluated. The 64 women and 36 men ranged in age from 19 to 72 yr (mean 42.5 yr), and 65 were related to the recipient while 35 were unrelated donors. Hospital admission the morning of surgery and use of a minimal open approach to the donor kidney were standard, as were post-operative epidural pain control and plans for short hospital stay. The 100 donors were hospitalized for 2 (25), 3 (48), 4 (18), 5 (8), or 6 (1) days, with an average length of stay of 3.12 d (range 2-6 d). The mean charge for kidney donor hospitalization was 14,470 dollars (range 9671-22,808 dollars). There were no major intra or immediate post-operative complications. Six rehospitalizations occurred for post-donation nausea, vomiting, dehydration (n = 2); spinal headache; pneumonia and wound haematoma; and late wound reexploration (one hernia and one nerve entrapment). All donors returned to pre-operative functional status within 6 d to 6 wk of donation. All kidneys functioned immediately in the 100 recipients (50 women, 50 men) who averaged 46.6 yr of age (range 17-69 yr); recipient length of stay averaged 3.81 d (range 2-15 d). All donors survived in excellent health; recipient graft and patient survival, respectively, are 87 and 90% through the entire 5-yr period. Excellent long-term outcomes for living kidney donors may be accomplished using minimal open surgical technique, post-operative epidural pain control and plans for a brief hospitalization. Expansion of living donor resources in renal transplant programs may grow as unrelated kidney donation and non-directed donation as well as minimally invasive (open and laparoscopic) techniques evolve.